References

17

19 Park, M.J., Jo, J.H., Donghee, P. et al. (2010). Comprehensive study on a

two-stage anaerobic digestion process for the sequential production of hydrogen

and methane from cost effective molasses. International Journal of Hydrogen

Energy 35 (12): 6194–6202.

20 Lindner, J., Zieloska, S., Oechsner, H. et al. (2016). Is the continuous two stage

anerobic digestion process well suited for all substrates? Bioresource Technology

200: 470–476.

21 Claudio, B., Servadio, P., and Marconi, S. (2012). Anaerobic digestate adminis-

tration: effect on soil physical and mechanical behavior. Communications in Soil

Science and Plant Analysis 43 (5): 821–834.

22 Moller, K. (2015). Effects of anaerobic digestion on soil carbon and nitrogen

turnover, N emissions, and soil biological activity. A review. Agronomy for Sus-

tainable Development 35: 1021–1041.

23 Chadwick, D.R. (2005). Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from

cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmospheric Environ-

ment 39 (4): 787–799.

24 Collins, H.P., Alva, A.K., and Streubel, J.D. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions

from an irrigated silt loam soil amended with anaerobically digested dairy

manure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75 (6): 2206–2216.

25 Diraviyam, T., Yogesh, B.J., Michael, A. et al. (2014). Methane mitigation by

using chicken egg yolk (IgY) antibodies generated against methanogens – a

review. Elixir Bio Technology 66: 20647–20652.